CURRENT KASHMIR CRISIS IS NOT A PAKISTANI CREATION

 Photo courtesy Mukhtar Khan, NAMNEWSNETWORK

Mukesh Devrari

Pakistani newspapers are obsessed with India these days. They are giving too much importance to the speeches of their leaders and statements of their bureaucrats. Reading them is like listening to someone totally inebriated and talking incessantly without caring what he or she means.

Former ambassadors and public intellectuals in Pakistan through their writings are encouraging their government to raise Kashmir issue. They think it will encourage Kashmiri Muslims to protest more vehemently against India. If their version is to be believed, Pakistan has successfully cornered India on Kashmir in United Nations and rest of the world and assimilation of Kashmir in Pakistan is days away.

In India, this perspective appears extremely ambitious and unrealistic. India lived peacefully for twenty years after 1971 war. During the 1990s Pakistan started creating troubles for India again by encouraging armed militancy in Kashmir. Although it is not entirely their fault, India contributed in it by rigging state assembly elections to help National Conference. Things went out of control. Militants with the support of local population forced Kashmiri Hindus to leave the Valley, India watched as a spectator. 

Current BJP government has no Pakistan policy. They do not have any idea how to deal with the current crisis. Their dilemma has been doubled with the fact that they cannot use the rhetorical language and resort to heroic actions which they preached when they were in opposition. All out war with Pakistan is not an option. Not because it is wrong or immoral in any manner in modern statecraft, but simply because we don’t have the capability to do it properly, secondly, Pakistan is not as weak as we would like to believe, thirdly, nuclear weapons in Pakistan will scare western world to force India to pursue peace rather than war. 

Indian policy makers must think of the reasons which suddenly encouraged Pakistan to attempt internationalization of Kashmir conflict. It is unrest in Kashmir valley which is behind our troubles. India must deal with Kashmiri stone pelters and separatists. It is a battle for winning hearts and minds. Otherwise, violence will lead to the spiral of violence.  That's bad publicity for India.

No one can separate Kashmir from India. However, it does not suit India to appear as an aggressive state which resorts to violence to suppress unrest. We may not like to believe but the reality is Kashmiri Muslims hate India, as it is Hindu majority nation. Mainstream India tries to promote liberal cultural values and imitates the western value system which is anathema to the conservative Muslim population. Radical Islam in Kashmir is at the root of all issues. The decline in the influence of religion likely to help India in the long run.  

It is also a fact that many Muslim nations buy Pakistani argument that as a Kashmiri Muslims should be given a choice to join the Islamic Republic of Pakistan through the plebiscite. Constant Pakistani propaganda is ruining the image of India. It is also a cause of concern. No one in India hates Kashmiris. Not a single person in Indian armed forces has any personal hatred or ill will towards Kashmiris.

How on earth Kashmiris expect India to treat terrorist, who have openly taken arms against India to deal with? How Burhan Wani's fate could have been different? Just compare how China and Sri Lanka dealt with separatists in their respective states and how India deals with it. India still has not yet resorted to absolute violent means to suppress the misguided Kashmiri youth. There are still checks and balances in the Indian constitution to stop the absolute violation of fundamental rights along with strong civil society groups. 

We must give a considerate hearing to all their concerns. We must do everything to make their life better. We must pull armed forces from civilian areas once the situation normalizes. All their demands within the parameters of Indian constitution should be accepted. This current crisis in Kashmir is not a Pakistani creation. 

 Indian armed forces released the pictures Burhan Wani after killing him in an encounter. Before he was killed, he shared his pictures along with other Islamic terrorists on social networking sites. They were published even by national media in India. These terrorists became a household name.

We could have forced Facebook to remove all his pictures. Our policymakers never thought why Americans decided to throw the body of Osama Bin Laden in an unknown place in the sea. India must not forget that it is facing a jihad in Kashmir valley. We cannot act as a totalitarian Chinese regime, but at the time we should ensure the cultural integration of Kashmir valley with mainstream India. 
end. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA OWNERSHIP AND ISSUES OF SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY

Image
Mukesh Devrari  Transnational media ownership means ownership of media assets by global corporate houses around the world. The word 'transnational' can easily be easily replaced with the term multinational. In other words, when a multinational company owns media companies around the globe that company can be described as a transnational media organization. There are plenty of such organizations, but most vilified among all is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  The nature of media is very different. As you all know media is a plural form of the medium. Production of films, TV serials, drama, theatre and other wings of the cultural industry are also owned by western media companies. Here, the meaning of the word transnational can be extended. Not necessarily western media companies own assets in the third world countries. They create their work in the west and sell it around the world.   It has long been a complaint against western media companies that wherever they g...
Read more

RESURGENCE OF NAZIS IN GERMAN, ITS NOT OVER YET FOR JEWS

Image
Book Review  Mukesh Devrari Eldad Beck’s new book ‘Germany, at odds’ reminds us about the resurgence of German nationalism in the 21 st century. German patriotism and racial nationalism, popularly known as Nazism, posed a threat to humanity in the 20 th century. Germans would like to forget about their troubling history. It reminds them of their barbarity and unconscious brutal tendencies. This book yet again proves that Nazi ideology did not end with the suicide of Adolf Hitler and hanging of many of his associates. Hitler was an elected leader. He came to power through democracy. When Jews were killed in concentration camps and pulled on roads from their houses like cattle, the German population remained silent. In connivance with their leaders, German population attempted extermination of Jews from the face of the earth. Now, almost 75 years after the end of the Second World War, Germans are trying to forget their past. They are attempting to embark on a pa...
Read more

Bacha Khan: One of pre-1947 India’s greatest leaders

Image
Mukesh Devrari The tallest Pashtun leader before the independence was Abdul Gaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi. He was one of the most fascinating and towering figures of Indian National Movement who preached truth and non-violence to his people who are mostly known for their tribal culture of revenge. He was the pre-eminent figure of Indian National Congress. “The British just about knew how to contend with vegetarian Hindus who raised slogans rather than guns, but Bacha Khan’s “unarmed army” of Pashtuns, which turned the martial race stereotype on its head, left them completely bewildered” (Shamsie, 2016) .   After Congress accepted the partition plan, he famously said, “You have thrown us in front of the wolves” (Tempest, 1988) . “He rejected a separate Muslim homeland and sought instead to join India to avoid Punjabi domination”  (Schofield, 2011, p. 38) . Due to his influence, many Muslims from the region migrated to India at the time of partition (Shukla...
Read more