DEMOCRATIZATION OF INTERNET IS AN UNFINISHED BATTLE

Photo - Nirmal Poddar

Mukesh Devrari 

The democratization of the internet means everyone who has an online presence should get the chance to make his or her voice heard equally. It must happen at both levels - at the level of individual and at the level of the nation-state. Internet is a complex phenomenon. Its social, political and economic impacts have not been studied yet. It inserts pressure at many points at a single point of time. It is difficult to capture its working with all its complexities.

DEMOCRATIZATION OF INTERNET AT REGIONAL LEVEL

In an ideal situation everyone should have the right to use the internet to connect with other members of society for free. It is a positive right. It can only be ensured by providing access to all. But to provide access to all cannot be a standalone exercise. It is attached to other determinants of economic development. Currently, only well off sections have access to the internet. It has increased the social, political and cultural hold of this section over the society in considerable ways.

Perhaps the same pattern was visible on human society when the paper was invented for the first time and when the formal educational system was introduced. Those who used it were in a position to deploy their newly acquired power to expand their influence and dominance. The emergence of the internet as a technology marks the same kind of an event in human history. In India, the influential groups are using internet in all possible ways to improve their lot. They are well placed to make use of it. The current situation can hardly be termed as democratic.  

Access to internet should be universal. It should become our fundamental right. Only then it can have any positive social and political influence. Twitter trends, Facebook posts and debates around them do not represent the churning of ideas and free thinking. It represents the power of a particular socio-economic group to make their voice heard. Democratization essentially means that each individual is equal in its ability to express an opinion.

Currently internet is like a large political rally in a huge playground. Not all can access the rally and participate in it. Only a handful of the population is participating in political and cultural processes through it. Will you call this political rally democratic exercise?

DEMOCRATIZATION OF INTERNET GLOBALLY

Current situation is highly problematic. It is dangerous to some extent. There are few companies which have a complete monopoly over the internet. Google is most powerful among all. It is impossible to imagine life without it. It has a monopoly over the search engine market. Almost every person on earth communicates through Gmail. There is no doubt western societies should be suitably rewarded for all research and innovation they have done. But these companies must not be allowed to establish monopoly all over the world.

Except China, only country which still has a little self-respect, all other nations are completely depended on western multinational giants to remain connected with each other.
Biggest joker among all of them is India. We call ourselves an information technology superpower. Does any Indian company have any global product which is used by masses around the globe?  The current situation can hardly be described as democratic. It represents a colonized state where powerful has completed dominated weaker ones.   

We have reached such a point, where any nation state will not dare to intervene to correct this imbalance. If anyone tried it will be fiercely by western nations and their media giants. As any attempt to democratize internet encroaches on the disproportionate power in the hands of western corporate houses. No dictator wants to reduce its sway.

Conclusion

Access to internet should become a fundamental right. Overall economic development will spur the use of the internet by one and all. The hungry, naked and illiterate population cannot do achieve much by getting access to the internet only. Influence and dominance should be divided globally among many groups. The monopoly of western internet giants will extend their global social, political and economic dominance. All nations should intervene and encourage the creation of national search engine, social networking sites and email companies to balance the might of western internet giants and democratize the internet.

 end. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA OWNERSHIP AND ISSUES OF SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY

Image
Mukesh Devrari  Transnational media ownership means ownership of media assets by global corporate houses around the world. The word 'transnational' can easily be easily replaced with the term multinational. In other words, when a multinational company owns media companies around the globe that company can be described as a transnational media organization. There are plenty of such organizations, but most vilified among all is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  The nature of media is very different. As you all know media is a plural form of the medium. Production of films, TV serials, drama, theatre and other wings of the cultural industry are also owned by western media companies. Here, the meaning of the word transnational can be extended. Not necessarily western media companies own assets in the third world countries. They create their work in the west and sell it around the world.   It has long been a complaint against western media companies that wherever they g...
Read more

RESURGENCE OF NAZIS IN GERMAN, ITS NOT OVER YET FOR JEWS

Image
Book Review  Mukesh Devrari Eldad Beck’s new book ‘Germany, at odds’ reminds us about the resurgence of German nationalism in the 21 st century. German patriotism and racial nationalism, popularly known as Nazism, posed a threat to humanity in the 20 th century. Germans would like to forget about their troubling history. It reminds them of their barbarity and unconscious brutal tendencies. This book yet again proves that Nazi ideology did not end with the suicide of Adolf Hitler and hanging of many of his associates. Hitler was an elected leader. He came to power through democracy. When Jews were killed in concentration camps and pulled on roads from their houses like cattle, the German population remained silent. In connivance with their leaders, German population attempted extermination of Jews from the face of the earth. Now, almost 75 years after the end of the Second World War, Germans are trying to forget their past. They are attempting to embark on a pa...
Read more

Bacha Khan: One of pre-1947 India’s greatest leaders

Image
Mukesh Devrari The tallest Pashtun leader before the independence was Abdul Gaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi. He was one of the most fascinating and towering figures of Indian National Movement who preached truth and non-violence to his people who are mostly known for their tribal culture of revenge. He was the pre-eminent figure of Indian National Congress. “The British just about knew how to contend with vegetarian Hindus who raised slogans rather than guns, but Bacha Khan’s “unarmed army” of Pashtuns, which turned the martial race stereotype on its head, left them completely bewildered” (Shamsie, 2016) .   After Congress accepted the partition plan, he famously said, “You have thrown us in front of the wolves” (Tempest, 1988) . “He rejected a separate Muslim homeland and sought instead to join India to avoid Punjabi domination”  (Schofield, 2011, p. 38) . Due to his influence, many Muslims from the region migrated to India at the time of partition (Shukla...
Read more