LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES OF KASHMIRIS MUST BE ADDRESSED
Mukesh
Devrari
First,
India is not China. It is not possible for any party to change the demography
of any state. Second, people in other states are not waiting to move inside
Kashmir and Ladakh in droves as it is being projected. Thirdly, details are not
known how the property rights will be managed in newly created Union territories
of J&K and Ladakh. It is important for the central government to clarify
details to counter the influx of rumours.
It seems
BJP has no plans to keep J&K as a union territory, but it has been declared
UT so that central government could have direct control over the state police
as they have it in New Delhi for the time being. Kashmiri rulers are no saints.
BJP is using their blunders as justification to scrap both the articles, including
their decision of not allowing thousands of Hindu migrants from Pakistan in
1947 to vote in legislative assembly elections. And also, their refusal to implement
many central laws including reservation for downtrodden communities. Though, it
will be wise on the part of supporters of BJP not to use the abolition of
article 370 as sarcasm to taunt and insult Kashmiri Muslims.
There is no
doubt, once the restrictions are removed, Muslims in the Kashmir valley are going
to oppose the move. It will be difficult for people to accept that article 370
and 35 A have been removed by the BJP government which will end their dominance.
Kashmiris are paying the price of getting swayed by the separatist brigade
aided and abetted by Pakistan. It is true to some extent that Kashmiri Muslims
feel more affinity to Muslims in Pakistan. As India is a predominantly a Hindu
state, but official decided to remain a secular country.
There is no
doubt some of the grievances of Kashmiris are legitimate. No civilian
population prefers armed forces in their midst. People want to live peacefully,
but frequent and violent protests forced the government to use paramilitary
forces. Kashmiris are today seeing Hindu domination in BJP, but when Congress
was in power Kashmiris were pelting stones. Even UPA was dismissed as Hindu
government. People looked for the politics of confrontation. In the form of BJP,
they hit the wall.
There are two things to understand. First, people already living in J&K should get voting rights in the assembly elections. This must include the migrants moved to the valley at the time of partition. It was a historic injustice with them. Second, Kashmiri Hindus, otherwise known as Kashmiri Pandits should get their property back. They should be allowed to go back and live in Kashmir valley including in the enclaves if they want. They were thrown out of their houses and became a refugee in their own country.
Some of the
legitimate concerns of Kashmiri Muslims must be addressed as concerns of victims of Kashmiri
Muslim ruling elite are being addressed. Some arrangements should be made to
preserve the rights of local communities in the state jobs as is being done in
other states. It will not be a special treatment. Here is an example. Let’s say
a candidate from Uttar Pradesh wants to apply for a job in Punjab through Punjab
Public Service Commission. Theoretically, the candidate can do so (legally),
but there will be a qualifying exam of the state’s language which candidate
needs to pass. It means you must qualify in the Punjabi language exam. Basically,
if a state has its own language, then it can bar candidates from other states. As it is difficult for a candidate from Uttarakhand to apply for Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and pass the Tamil language exam, which is mandatory language exam in the state. In Hindi states, it is Hindi in place of Tamil and so on.
During Congress rule, things were approached very differently.
When the Central University was established in Kashmir, all the Muslims faculties
were appointed. It cannot be a matter of coincidence that all faculty members
including the Vice-Chancellor of the Central University of Kashmir were a
Muslim despite the fact that it was a central university in the initial days.
On the other hand, after BJP came to the power Kashmiri Pandit was appointed as
Vice-Chancellor, although it is difficult to correct the pattern now. Considerations were always other than merit.
As article 370 and 35 A have been scrapped. It would be
appropriate to take into consideration the legitimate aspiration of people of
the state. Central government must ensure that the government jobs in the state
should go to the people of the state. IAS and IPS officers already from the
Union Public Service Commission, but it makes no sense to appoint candidates
from north India states as officers through state public service commissions,
who have no sense of allegiance to the local people and their distinct culture.
A symbolic gesture like this will go a long way. People are
shamelessly commenting about marrying Kashmiri women and buying plots as sarcasm
for insulting Kashmiri Muslims. This behaviour will only enrage the Kashmiris
who are feeling a collective sense of loss due to the scrapping of article 370
and 35 A. There is no doubt this decision by BJP will lead to the widespread
violence in the valley. It can only be hoped that police forces will not
retaliate with disproportionate force to curb the protests.
Otherwise, it will lead to a cycle of violence. If youngsters
will be killed on the streets, more people will be enraged, the more people are
angry the more they will protest, the heavier will be the clampdown, then there
will be more grievances. This cycle of violence will not do any favour to us
and will be considered a blot on the democracy of our country.
Personally, this author does not want anyone to lose his eyes
due to the pellet guns, it is better to be hit by a bullet than losing eyesight. After this decision, the real challenge for BJP will be to manage law and order in Kashmir valley.
End.
The deployment of troops in huge numbers and making the region the most militarized region in the world. These cannot be the result of 16 year olds throwing stones at fully armed men. Doesn't this along with many other indicators suggest that the Indian state sees Kashmir as a land to grab and as a hostile place not really a place that is supposed be so integral?
ReplyDelete