UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IS NOT ABOUT HINDU DOMINANCE


Screen shot from the website of The Hindu. 

 Mukesh Devrari

In the morning I came across a column written against uniform civil code in the editorial page of ‘The Hindu’. The essay was written by Nivedita Menon. She is a professor at JNU, New Delhi and describes herself as a feminist scholar.

In her column titled ‘It isn’t about the woman’, she gave reasons to support the continuation of Sharia based Muslim personal law in India and argued against prohibiting polygamy and triple talaq. She described the Uniform Civil Code as a Hindu agenda to impose Hindu laws on Muslims.

I could resist myself and scribbled a few lines to critique her arguments. It is important to critically examine her grotesque narrative on the issue. She is denying democratic space available to Muslim women in secular democracies like India. According to her even in secular democracies if Muslims women need any right, they should find it within the Islamic faith. 

Recently a Muslim woman Shayara Bano received talaq by post. Her lawyer, Nivedita Menon grudges, instead of using any of the other recourses available in the protection of distressed women decided to file public interest litigation (PIL) in Supreme Court of India.

Why should not a hapless woman use all possible methods to get justice? Why she should seek rights and justice within limits drawn by Islam? India is not a Taliban. It is a secular republic. This country needs a uniform civil code for all its citizens. It is not fair to create different laws for different religions. 

These separate personnel laws must not be allowed to exist in India. They are based on religion and deny gender equality and refuse to accept the common sense of the 21st century. Uniform civil code should not become Hindu vs. Muslim debate. Laws regulating the lives of citizens should be based on enlightened modern values ensuring justice, equality and liberty.

Professor Nivedita Menon writes, “Polygamy is not exclusive to Muslims. Hindu men are polygamous too except that because polygamy is legally banned in Hindu law, subsequent wives have no legal standing and no protection under the law.”

In a strange twist of logic she is describing how Sharia laws are bringing the positive changes in the lives of women. Basically, she is suggesting that men are going to have multiple wives in India irrespective of what law says on the issue. It is better to have Sharia law than a universal secular law to help and support multiple wives.  

She does not stop here, after this she throws a bigger stone on the common sense of people reading her article. Under the Sharia law, on the contrary, subsequent wives have rights and husbands have the obligation.” Allowing men to have four fives is not allowed even in moderate Muslims nations. It would be considered highly regressive to even indirectly support such social evils.   

Prof. Menon also adopts diversionary tactics. She tried to argue that it is not even an issue. We should rather talk about how to protect wives in the patriarchal institution of marriage. At another instance, she also dismissed the possibility of creating a uniform civil code by borrowing all good principles from all the personnel laws.  

I don’t have time and energy to underline the big holes in all her arguments in every second paragraph of her essay. She was desperate to somehow prove that demand for uniform civil code in India is the agenda of Hindu fundamentalists. She converted the out of context question posed by a reporter in some television channel into the symbol of Hindu designs against Islam and Muslims.

A reporter asked Shayaro Bano, whose lawyer filed the PIL in Supreme Court, what she thinks about ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jay’ slogan controversy. Mrs Bano replied, “I feel all Muslims should say it”.

Prof. Menon says this alone should alert us to what the demand for the uniform civil code is all about. Perhaps she was suggesting that Mrs Bano’s remark about the slogan should be interpreted as her acceptance of the dominance of the Hindu community over Muslims.

This style of argumentation is highly problematic. Indirectly she is empowering the Muslim fundamentalists who will prefer to implement the religious laws which are out of sync with the realities of the contemporary social values. Even though the title of her essay 'it is not about women', she is suggesting that if you are supporting uniform civil code you are having motives other than achieving gender equality.    

This the debate is not about Hindu, Muslim and Christians. This is all about making India a better place and attempt to run away from absurd, irrational and cruel customary practices.

It is difficult to support the continuation of personals laws because it has religious sanction in democratic societies. That’s why Islamic scholars are trying to hide behind dense legal language and trying to create a discourse, where any demand for Uniform Civil Code is being projected as Hindu design against Muslims.

For progress religion must be kept as a personal affair. It cannot be the basis of any laws.  

end. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA OWNERSHIP AND ISSUES OF SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY

Image
Mukesh Devrari  Transnational media ownership means ownership of media assets by global corporate houses around the world. The word 'transnational' can easily be easily replaced with the term multinational. In other words, when a multinational company owns media companies around the globe that company can be described as a transnational media organization. There are plenty of such organizations, but most vilified among all is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  The nature of media is very different. As you all know media is a plural form of the medium. Production of films, TV serials, drama, theatre and other wings of the cultural industry are also owned by western media companies. Here, the meaning of the word transnational can be extended. Not necessarily western media companies own assets in the third world countries. They create their work in the west and sell it around the world.   It has long been a complaint against western media companies that wherever they g...
Read more

RESURGENCE OF NAZIS IN GERMAN, ITS NOT OVER YET FOR JEWS

Image
Book Review  Mukesh Devrari Eldad Beck’s new book ‘Germany, at odds’ reminds us about the resurgence of German nationalism in the 21 st century. German patriotism and racial nationalism, popularly known as Nazism, posed a threat to humanity in the 20 th century. Germans would like to forget about their troubling history. It reminds them of their barbarity and unconscious brutal tendencies. This book yet again proves that Nazi ideology did not end with the suicide of Adolf Hitler and hanging of many of his associates. Hitler was an elected leader. He came to power through democracy. When Jews were killed in concentration camps and pulled on roads from their houses like cattle, the German population remained silent. In connivance with their leaders, German population attempted extermination of Jews from the face of the earth. Now, almost 75 years after the end of the Second World War, Germans are trying to forget their past. They are attempting to embark on a pa...
Read more

Bacha Khan: One of pre-1947 India’s greatest leaders

Image
Mukesh Devrari The tallest Pashtun leader before the independence was Abdul Gaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi. He was one of the most fascinating and towering figures of Indian National Movement who preached truth and non-violence to his people who are mostly known for their tribal culture of revenge. He was the pre-eminent figure of Indian National Congress. “The British just about knew how to contend with vegetarian Hindus who raised slogans rather than guns, but Bacha Khan’s “unarmed army” of Pashtuns, which turned the martial race stereotype on its head, left them completely bewildered” (Shamsie, 2016) .   After Congress accepted the partition plan, he famously said, “You have thrown us in front of the wolves” (Tempest, 1988) . “He rejected a separate Muslim homeland and sought instead to join India to avoid Punjabi domination”  (Schofield, 2011, p. 38) . Due to his influence, many Muslims from the region migrated to India at the time of partition (Shukla...
Read more