CAN LIES AND UNTRUTHS RESHAPE INDIA?

Mukesh Devrari   

It is good to have nationalism in newly carved out states, but it is grossly wrong to use lies and untruths and twisted history to mislead about the greatness of the past. RSS and its ideologues are ravaging the modern Indian history. They are giving new twists and turns to thoughts of our great leaders of the past. Unfortunately, they also have great acceptance among the youngsters who have no exposure to social sciences beyond school days.

In the absence of access and exposure to correct history, youths pursuing disciplines other than social sciences do not have a tool to deal and make sense of right-wing propaganda. Recently Indresh Kumar, member of the national executive of RSS visited Dehradun and delivered a speech in Graphic Era Hill University in a seminar organized on national security. He said many good things, but also many baseless things. This author dismisses some notions narrated by RSS ideologue in his speech.

He said, “Mahatma Gandhi did not deliver any speech after independence because he wanted one India, not truncated India. Gandhi compromised with two nation theory. If he would have declared fast unto death, The British government and Congress party would not have dared to sign the partition plan. Nehru and other Congress leaders pressurized Gandhi to remain silent. He buckled under pressure.”

RSS ideologue conveniently ignored that Jinnah and his direct action day (call for communal riots by Muslim League) type of events would have resulted in an unparalleled blood bath in the history of mankind. Jinnah and other Muslim leaders were not ready to compromise. They were seeking a very weak centre or complete partition. Jinnah was never very fond of non-violent and peaceful methods to achieve political objectives. He would have gone to any extent. His direct action day resulted in the large scale killings of Non-Muslims in the Muslim majority areas. In retaliation, many Muslims were also killed in communal riots.

It will be an injustice to Congress and Nehru to say that they willingly accepted partition. In fact, Congress was forced to accept the partition by the circumstances of that period. Secondly, the Muslim League was asking for the weak union. In that case, Balkanization of India was almost a certainty. Even with a strong centre, India is facing difficulty at so many places today.

RSS also rewriting the roles and values held by Dr B. R. Ambedkar. According to RSS ideologue, “Ambedkar’s greatness lies in the fact that he refused to accept Islam and Christianity. He did not want to lose Indian culture. That’s why he went for indigenous religion, not for the foreign one. The British government wanted to divide India into three parts. First, Hindu dominated the state. Second, Muslim dominated state and third is Christian states with Dalit, SC, ST and OBC communities. But they could not find the leader of the third group. Ambedkar refused to become the leader of the third group. Christians wanted to convert all lower caste Hindus.”

This argument seems impossible in the face of the facts. In their 200 hundred years rule, the British government did not bother much about the religion of their Indian subjects. If they would have decided to change the religion of people of this land, they could have easily done it. It is only a conspiracy theory. In fact, a separate homeland for untouchables was a threat to Congress to mend its ways and care more about the interests of marginalized groups. It will not be totally correct to put the entire blame of partition on the British government. Muslim League successfully mobilized Muslims on this issue. The British government did not have perfect control over the evolution of political forces in India.

The list of right-wing lies is long.

end. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA OWNERSHIP AND ISSUES OF SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY

Image
Mukesh Devrari  Transnational media ownership means ownership of media assets by global corporate houses around the world. The word 'transnational' can easily be easily replaced with the term multinational. In other words, when a multinational company owns media companies around the globe that company can be described as a transnational media organization. There are plenty of such organizations, but most vilified among all is owned by Rupert Murdoch.  The nature of media is very different. As you all know media is a plural form of the medium. Production of films, TV serials, drama, theatre and other wings of the cultural industry are also owned by western media companies. Here, the meaning of the word transnational can be extended. Not necessarily western media companies own assets in the third world countries. They create their work in the west and sell it around the world.   It has long been a complaint against western media companies that wherever they g...
Read more

RESURGENCE OF NAZIS IN GERMAN, ITS NOT OVER YET FOR JEWS

Image
Book Review  Mukesh Devrari Eldad Beck’s new book ‘Germany, at odds’ reminds us about the resurgence of German nationalism in the 21 st century. German patriotism and racial nationalism, popularly known as Nazism, posed a threat to humanity in the 20 th century. Germans would like to forget about their troubling history. It reminds them of their barbarity and unconscious brutal tendencies. This book yet again proves that Nazi ideology did not end with the suicide of Adolf Hitler and hanging of many of his associates. Hitler was an elected leader. He came to power through democracy. When Jews were killed in concentration camps and pulled on roads from their houses like cattle, the German population remained silent. In connivance with their leaders, German population attempted extermination of Jews from the face of the earth. Now, almost 75 years after the end of the Second World War, Germans are trying to forget their past. They are attempting to embark on a pa...
Read more

Bacha Khan: One of pre-1947 India’s greatest leaders

Image
Mukesh Devrari The tallest Pashtun leader before the independence was Abdul Gaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi. He was one of the most fascinating and towering figures of Indian National Movement who preached truth and non-violence to his people who are mostly known for their tribal culture of revenge. He was the pre-eminent figure of Indian National Congress. “The British just about knew how to contend with vegetarian Hindus who raised slogans rather than guns, but Bacha Khan’s “unarmed army” of Pashtuns, which turned the martial race stereotype on its head, left them completely bewildered” (Shamsie, 2016) .   After Congress accepted the partition plan, he famously said, “You have thrown us in front of the wolves” (Tempest, 1988) . “He rejected a separate Muslim homeland and sought instead to join India to avoid Punjabi domination”  (Schofield, 2011, p. 38) . Due to his influence, many Muslims from the region migrated to India at the time of partition (Shukla...
Read more