MARCHING TOWARDS UNSUSTAINABLE FUTURE
The earth has enough resources for our needs – not for our
greed – Mahatma Gandhi
In the early nineteenth century renowned political economist
Thomas Robert Malthus tried to point out that the incremental growth in food
production can never match the food requirements of an exponentially growing
population. He suggested that a better way to deal with the problem is to open sewer
lines. It would lead to the spread of diseases and the result will be an immediate
reduction in population.
Today Malthus can be charged with underestimating the
resilience of human beings as a biological entity against the odds of life and
nature. Lot has changed since then. Requirements of human beings now go far
beyond mere food. The lifestyle of westerners suggests earth has enough not only to
fulfil our needs but also our greed. It seems each one of us can have things
in abundance.
The byproduct of modern man’s quest for progress is changes
in physical, chemical and biological characteristics of land, air and water
which are harmfully affecting the human life and every desirable living thing
on earth. Global warming is a reality and changing patterns in atmosphere are
visible.
Till now all developmental paradigms aspire to achieve
developmental goals by harnessing the natural resources. Quite a few strains of
thought within the existing paradigms of dominant development discourse
propagates the planning and implementing alternative environmental friendly
methods of progress without hindering the aspiration of large swathes of
population.
Our society is divided into classes. No geographical entity
known as a nation state is an exception to this fact. Not the entire population
shares the blame for utter destruction and chaos in the form of global warming,
climate change and depleting Ozone layer. Haves are more responsible. But the
ideological structures present in society also make sure that aspirations and
priorities of have-nots are not different from haves.
Can scientific and technological advancements rescue life on
earth in its diverse manifestations? It seems the permanent solution to the
looming danger on the existence of life on earth lies in the reprioritization
and reinterpretation of essence and essentials of economic, social and
political arrangements in tune with sustainability.
The attempt to achieve developmental goals by rapid
liberalization and industrialization which promotes crass consumerism across
the globe is dichotomous to the very idea of curbing human greed and protecting
ecology. Acceptance of ecologically friendly way of life by humans is
definitely going to diminish the threats and pave the way for establishing
balance with nature.
Developing countries are reeling under the dual threat.
Forest cover is a parameter to judge the health of nature and ecology. In the
developing countries, on the one hand, industrialization is taking its toll and
on the other due to population explosion forest lands are under threat from
poor people who live in and around forests. India is losing 1.5 million
hectares of forest cover each year. Serious degradation and depletion have been
caused through overuse, misuse and mismanagement of resources to meet human
greed.
In a response to a question whether he did not wish to see
India reach the level of prosperity of Britain, Mahatma Gandhi said, “It took
Britain half the resources of the planet to achieve this prosperity. How many
planets will country like India require?”
It is time of all of us to accept our errors and correct
them.
end.
Comments
Post a Comment